<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pundit House &#187; Scott Cumbie</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pundithouse.com/category/houseguests/scottcumbie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pundithouse.com</link>
	<description>Charlotte Mecklenburg Conservative News and Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 02:36:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A Constitutional Conversation on Recess Appointments</title>
		<link>http://pundithouse.com/2012/01/a-constitutional-conversation-on-recess-appointments/</link>
		<comments>http://pundithouse.com/2012/01/a-constitutional-conversation-on-recess-appointments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 11:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Cumbie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Scott Cumbie]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pundithouse.com/?p=8301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The discussions this week over the constitutionality of the presidential “recess” appointments have revolved around whether the Senate was in recess or not.  In actuality, the “recess” issue is irrelevant to the question of constitutionality.  For the purposes of this discussion, let us take the President’s position and assume that the Senate was in recess.  [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pundithouse.com/2012/01/a-constitutional-conversation-on-recess-appointments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
